Skip to main content

Crime & Immigration: Claims vs Facts

At a glance 

Overall crime is far lower than in the 1990s; some serious crimes (e.g., sexual offences) have risen in recent years.

Most people prosecuted are white, reflecting the UK’s majority-white population.

Foreign nationals do not “dominate” prisons; they are a small minority of the prison population.

High-quality studies find no general link between immigration and violent crime.

Common claims vs. what the data shows

Claim: “Violence in our cities is spiralling.”
Fact: Long-run national measures of crime are down sharply vs the 1990s. Some types (e.g., knife crime, sexual offences) have risen in recent years and can spike locally, but the overall long-term trajectory is not a sustained “spiral.”

Claim: “Immigration is driving violent crime.”
Fact: The best UK research finds no robust overall link between immigration and violent crime. Some studies find small, mixed effects on property crime depending on local context; others find no effect or small reductions.

Claim: “Foreigners fill up our prisons.”
Fact: Foreign nationals are a minority of the prison population. The largest group in prison is UK nationals. Minority ethnic disproportionality exists and is a serious issue, but it is inaccurate to say foreign nationals “dominate” prisons.

Claim: “Most violence is committed by migrants/minorities.”
Fact: Most defendants are white. That mirrors the population share. Disproportionalities exist across the system (e.g., by ethnicity in stop/search and sentencing outcomes), but the blanket claim above is false.

Claim: “Cities are uniquely unsafe everywhere.”
Fact: Urban areas often record higher rates (more people, night-time economy, tourism), but national victimisation risk has fallen a lot over decades. City league tables can mislead due to recording practices and daily population flows.

Claim: “Small-boats arrivals made streets more dangerous.”
Fact: National trends don’t show a causal link between recent asylum arrivals and violent crime. Recent net migration is driven largely by work and study routes; crime trends don’t map cleanly onto migration flows.

Claim: “Publishing suspects’ nationality/ethnicity proves the point.”
Fact: Arrests are not guilt; ethnicity is often unknown/not recorded; and enforcement patterns affect who gets stopped or arrested. Single-incident anecdotes cannot stand in for population-level evidence.

Quick stats box

  • Crime trend:

    Headline crime significantly lower than 1990s peaks; some serious crimes up in recent years.

  • Prosecutions by ethnicity:

    Majority are white each year.

  • Prison composition:

    Largest group is UK nationals; foreign nationals ≈ low-teens % of the total.

  • Migration purposes:

    Driven mainly by work and study; asylum is smaller.

QM Fact Check

Information from the Office of National Statistics (ONS)

Crimes against individuals and households have generally decreased in the last ten years.

For the year to March 2024 crime overall was up 7% but this increase can largely be attributed to fraud which has increased by 31%. 

Shop lifting has also increased by 20% (likely due to the cost of living crisis).

Violent crime involving knives is down 1%, with fire arms down 21% and robbery also down by 3%.

Sexual offences are up 5% but this figure reflects trends in improved police recording practices.

Sexual assault prevalence has not changed significantly between pre-Covid periods and 2023.

As of March 2024 the number of foreign nationals in prison is 12%. The top 5 nationalities are:  Armenian, Polish, Romanian, Irish and Jamaicans.

87% of prisoners are British. Of the general population 82% are white, 3% mixed, 9% Asian or Asian British, 4% black or black British, 2% not stated.  

Ways figures can be mis-represented to the public

  • Using the number of defendants in a crime category. For example in sexual assault 14242 defendants as opposed to convictions 8098.
  • Using outdated population estimates to inflate the statistical possibility of a foreign national committing a crime in any category.
  • It should also be noted that ethnic minorities are disproportionately likely to be subject to police checks.

How to read crime stories responsibly

Prefer national survey trends over isolated police figures or viral clips.

Check timeframes (month vs decade), per-capita rates, and definitions (recorded crime vs survey).

Be wary of anecdotes and selective release of suspect characteristics without denominators.